Author's Remarks:
The concluding line in this poem was included not only because it fits adequately into the symmetry of the rest of the poem and the general thoughts I undoubtedly want to naturally and obviously outline but likewise also, because when there are undeniably cretinously arrogant morons about who assume that they either can as well as rather asininely set out to coerce the British government and other UK authorities to act as dimwittedly as they are and usurp to themselves the role of “Thought Police” my own counter reaction to that as a mentally liberated person is to summarily let such idiots know what they can do with themselves while carrying on intelligently, and similarly responsibly, by doing what I always do and which is to categorically and significantly think for myself.

How “from the river to the sea” can be anti-Semitic beats me when those who’re said to be using it as their purported battle hymn, namely the Palestinians, are themselves unquestionably biologically SEMITES, and the interlopers, who took their land from them and that they’re allegedly using this slogan against, purportedly while claiming to be Semites, rather pertinently and most categorically, significantly aren’t any such thing; as they’re unquestionably white Caucasians undoubtedly from Europe; never mind that a few of them practise Judaism which, not dissimilar from Christianity and the Muslim faith, is a Semitic religion, simply because these faiths were created by people who were genuinely biologically SEMITES. And to use the asinine arguments you’re evidently and idiotically proselytizing makes no sense to anyone with a functioning brain and who can think for themselves. No wonder, with the lack of such people among your lot, you effectively, and quite essentially as well, distinctly do need a thought police. Charles Windsor is constitutionally, in a country that has no constitution, unlike the USA, Germany and other white ruled countries for example, effectively the Head of the Church of England – make of that what you will, regarding a serial adulterer; who either obviously has no clue about or any discernible regard for the Christian 7th Commandment, but all the same he’s the C of E’s head and supposedly a Christian. Quite essentially I’m also a member of the Anglican Church – High Church C of E precisely, as we call it in Barbados, but it’s a properly ordained religious figure, an Archbishop, who heads the Church there and unlike England the Anglican Church in Barbados is completely separated from the state, which is not the case in the UK, as you essentially have Bishops sitting in the House of Lords and MPs and Prime Ministers like Boris Kemal-Johnson determining not only who these principal bishops should be but likewise also the top man as well, namely the Archbishop of Canterbury. But to return to Charles; he’s white and I’m Black and we’re both also British. Should I now therefore because I’m a devout member of the Anglican faith and a committed Christian as well, call myself a SEMITE, because the religion of which I’m a part and have been all my life was founded by Semites; or should Charles do the same?

Quite preposterous wouldn't you say if either of those two ridiculous propositions did actually occur? So why the hell then and obviously in the era of the DNA are we having fraudsters that are simply and very effectively playing the most catastrophic, of all the pogroms experienced by their white Caucasian people and within Europe at the hands of their own European kind - not Palestinians, not Barbadians - for every bloody financial windfall they can carry on incessantly getting, because of selective white guilt, but only to them, not anyone else who were similarly victims of that European holocaust: Evidently no gypsies whose death toll was far in excess of the 6 million stated "Jews"; quite distinctly no Rhineland Niggers, as those Black French men and women were called, and the list goes on – yet it was they, European Jews, but initially the Sephardic Jews, who initiated and profited immensely from the Transatlantic Slave Trade in my beloved ancestral homeland of Barbados; but we ourselves nor the rest of the world mustn’t remember, or dwell on that – the utter blatant hypocrisy; since no one else in the world but EUROPEANS were responsible for that continent’s holocaust, as the same odious mother fuckers see fit to forget the other holocausts likewise perpetrated across the globe by other European nations, notably Britain, France, Spain, Portugal and Germany where in what’s now independent Namibia but then was a German colony of Southwest Africa, as all the enforced colonies were as obviously the indigenous people didn’t invite them in, but Namibia then as Southwest Africa systematically had over 80% of its indigenous population wilfully wiped out, with the Germans openly admitting that it was to be a precursor for what barbarically subsequently occurred in Europe. So drain Germany financially as much as you want to you acquisitive Zionists but cut all the lying and disingenuous crap about the Palestinians, as what you have is what you actually took from them. No different from Australia, New Zealand, Canada the USA and the Chagos Islands; with those in Australia asininely and essentially so contemptuously claiming that Australia was Terra nullius, empty of any living people, notwithstanding the fact that the Aborigines have been living there in their own homeland continuously for in excess of 66 thousand years. But you kiss-me-ass whites unquestionably, self-evidently have convenient memories!

And as far as slogans do go - does this one ring a bell with you fucking, idiotic hypocritical whites: “The only good Black person is a dead one.” You’re not going to own up to it, you never bloody well do to your acts of barbarity so why this? Should this also be a distinctive subject matter for the Thought Police? I don’t think so; and I don’t know of any other mentally liberated Black person that would want that to be the case. And as I’ve said several times previously, Zionists and Zionism have bugger all to do with Judaism or any other religion; since it’s distinctively a political creed, no different from Nazism; and all that its evilly vile and sick adherents are doing amounts to nothing more than a very calculated takeover of most, though not all, aspects of Judaism. And we know precisely why - loads of money; not only ongoingly received from Germany through the Weidergutmachen Compensation Scheme and which has run into literally billions, as well as what you get from the USA for not having nuclear weapons; which even the most obtuse prat in the world knows is a fucking lie, since Israel and its Zionist bastards has plenty of them but under US laws the United States of America cannot finance rogue nuclear states, those that don't sign the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty and refuse to let the international nuclear watchdog inspect their facilities and officially confirm the authenticity of their situation. Israel has intentionally bailed on all of these same conditions others must comply with; as the USA accommodates and plays their same fucking daft game, pretending that they don't know whether this rogue state Israel has such weapons or not. Yet only this week a senior Israel cabinet minister was suspended for say Israel should nuke Gaza to the deafening applause of the surfeit of rightwingers and predictably the Daily Mail readers and commenters. And prompts the question: how can you nuke someone if you don't have nuclear weapons. Quite as daft as expecting or suggesting that a thoroughly confirmed azoospermiac becomes a biological father! LOL! But there are many such fathers in Britain; used as always by the trollop and slapper Karens. Yet sensible folk are supposed to see and treat these Zionists as victims; and even more stomach churningly so as "Semitic" ones!

#Greed #Racism #SelfEntitlement