Author's Remarks:
Some obviously like and are quite in their state of mind very amenable to fawning over and even idiolizing their so-called royal family. Other folk don't however intelligently behave this way. Therefore, in the marked absence of a democratically held referendum to determine once and for all whether or not Britain should retain its unelected and hereditary birth right monarchy or actually get rid of it, here's a reasonable and logical compromise.
Those taxpayer that want to retain the monarchy should be statutorily made to pay for it while those who don't want to shouldn't have to; all this essentially accompanied by a legal register where everyone 18 and over would state their preference on this matter. This would be to forestall the prime jackasses in Britain and who infest it with their vile presence from wanting a monarchy but not wishing to fork out financially for it and with rather severe legal penalties, financially as well as actually including imprisonment for those who break the law!
Since I personally don't understand at all how taking money, as is currently the status quo at present, from the poor who might well be considerably so anti monarchist, in order that these actually unwarranted, very distinctly privileged "toffs" can live an overly extravagant lifestyle, is totally unacceptable in this day and age!
And for what purpose actually? Even Diana openly admitted in a televised interview that projects are designed to make "royal spouses" appear busy, as without them, Diana emphatically went on, there would be nothing for them to do.
And while asininely pontificating about Kate Middleton and her positive effect: positive or otherwise on those who're actually living in Britain; have you ever thought of ascertaining what your vile effect and presence in Canada is having on its genocidally murdered and quite barbarically dispossessed Indigenous Canadians, Arna. I thought not! So why don't you and your odious lowlife sort ask them?