Author's Remarks:
The Martin Bashir interview was 25 years ago! Why the furore now over it Buckingham Palace? As if the non-fawning, discernibly intelligent too, and conscionably moral residents in the UK - and ourselves very much in the minority in 21st Century Britain - aren't actually aware of what you're doing, and why? This dishonest crap of yours will undeniably be music to the ears of intellectually challenged, obsequious Little England Brexiteers and characteristically too delusional psycopathic, obviously wannabe USA dictator Donald Drumpf, aficionados but no one with a functioning brain!

Did Diana want to do the interview? Yes! And for quite good reasons too!
Furthermore, she was an adult, not a child, and had freely not only made up her mind but also fully given her adult permission to do it. There was no coercion of her by Martin Bashir and in legal terms that's irrefutably informed consent!

Also, it gave Diana the valid right to tell the public at large about the farce of a marriage she was most cynically conned into from its very outset and also disastrously, most adulterously by her husband Charles - even on the night prior to their marriage the next day - and similarly dehumanizing for her and likewise routinely carried on throughout that bogus marriage that she was trapped in. Summed up quite succinctly when Diana unequivocally and painfully declared that there was always three persons in her marriage to Charles!

A public acknowledgement that both incensed and totally embarrassed the Palace, and a principal contributory factor why Diana had to be got rid of, and was murdered! A sickening state of affairs condoned by totally inured toadying royalist and idiotically post menopausal; delusional, dimwitted, braindead and purblind cunt, Ingrid Seward - who recently hinted, in that sycophantic toadying of hers, that an identical fate - ie her murder - should similarly befall Meghan Markle!

My instant riposte to that was swift, decidedly uncompromising and also unapologetic in a poem I wrote then about Ingrid Seward, and remains so. That poem can be found on this site. Meanwhile, I do recommend and also earnestly wish that those who vilely desire to exploit Diana for their own nefarious purposes simply leave her to rest in peace. And that's a clear exhortation, too, to her moronic, not too bright, racist, elder son William!

Diana was neither worldly wise nor sexually experienced when her own sister Sarah that among others in her person repertoire of lovers had had a sexual fling with Charles, and then subsequently introduced the literally innocent Diana to her previous lover, was quite expediently proposed to by Charles at the staged behest of distinctly of the complete Windsor and Spencer families.

Not least so because Diana, in their sick and twisted notions, had all the right qualities: her youth, medically proven virginity and a biological link to the English nobility. Love, most definitely, was not a part of the equation; basically because the Saxe-Coburg-Gothe-Mountbatten-Windsor family don't do love! Their obligatory concerns being the absolute retention not only of the familial Firm but also the profitably ongoing, sickening and essentially fictional notion of exactly who and what they really are!

Besides in classic incestuously inbred fashion with this lot, Charles had also previously, at the concerted behest of his family, been coerced to propose to his second cousin Amanda: the granddaughter of his great uncle, similarly biologically too his dad Philip's uncle Mountbatten, that practicably refused his offer of marriage to her, stating that she didn't "want to surrender herself to a system." Now contrast her rational explanation and the MSM acceptance of it with their odious vitriol mendaciously and quite racially speciously levelled, and blatantly still is, towards Meghan and Harry basically saying and doing the same thing relevant to this rather noxious family/Firm.

Conspicuously, in her case, marrying for love Diana quite naively expected her husband to reciprocate, if not all, at least some of that love. To her utter horror and chagrin Charles didn't! As he wasn't, nor ever had been, in love with Diana, and Camilla the woman whom he love, and still does, he'd crucially been prevented from initially marrying. As such Diana eventually painfully and humiliatingly realized she was nothing more than simply a publicly glorified broodmare merely to further consolidate the Windsor's family Firm. Disgraceful and cynical behaviour in extremis! And who but manifestly obsequious brown-nosers to these medieval, Dark Ages mindset scum can quite honestly blame Diana for how she reacted?

You, William, very much alike your lascivious, serially adulterous grandfather Philip and your father Charles, conjoined with likeminded members of both sexes inside the Windsor and Spencer dysfunctional families, may well be delightfully happy, in spite of your own discernible bed hopping, to settle as you've done for Catherine as the compulsively Stepford type social climbing wife and, characteristically, the reliable broodmare, which lazy waity Kate is most happy to be; but the naked truth is, that your mother Diana wasn't willing to be. So my candid suggestion to you William is unapologetically this - sensibly get yourself a worthwhile life, grow up, and move on!

#DelusionHatredStupidity #Denial