Author’s Remarks:
Camilla Parker Bowles assiduously and relentlessly played the long game expertly and consequently won what she obviously always regarded as the first prize. As such, she now deliriously happy; and why with an odiously evil and an egregiously life long, determined mind-set like hers and callousness rampantly pervading every inch of her lecherous and adulterous body shouldn’t she?
After all, she’s got everything she ever wanted: a dead Diana; the British crown, effectively demoting a skilfully manipulated Charles into being not only her soiled tampon aficionado but likewise her own, and effectively also the UK’s, King Consort. And furthermore, having got Charles to lying claim to his late mother Liz Windsor that he wasn’t financially able to support Harry, Meghan or any likely children that they possibly had, on top of William, Kate and their brood, had him nevertheless having no problems whatsoever financially, and quite liberally so, setting up substantial trust funds for her own birth children, and presumably not Charles’ own!
So what point are you making Daily Mail relative to your article about Camilla and just how exuberantly gay she is? I personally don’t think it for one moment - but that said anything self-evidently so, except beneficent goodness, is possible with Camilla Parker Bowles – but as one commenter questioned in response to your article, are you subtly suggesting that Camilla Parker Bowles is gay?