Author's Remarks:
Quite relative to her exclusion from this Singaporean trip, and for the ludicrous reason given; if Kate Middleton wants to actually and indisputably so live the life of a British suburban woman and mother, why then did she with her much unrestrained stalking capabilities marry into the Windsor family?
And is the Daily Mail which consistently to the virtual point of a toxic obsession keeps on vibrantly telling us how much on the obvious rocks of destruction the marriage of Harry and Meghan is, quite literally doing in its castigating of them without an iota of substantive evidence to effectively support the Daily Mail and its odious hacks very racist contentions in their disparaging bullshit to the crass surfeit of gullible Karens and Gammons further enthused by this in their actually self-evidently, compulsive brownnosing, monarchical fawning; now basically so, preparing them all for a Charles/Diana type breakup between William and Kate by rehashing a rather distinctly fatuous story from almost 20 years ago, clearly when Meghan evidently unquestionably wasn't around and very irrefutably didn't know Harry and significantly too hadn't even met him then!
Nevertheless this very recent Daily Mail rehash of this story clearly pertaining to how the Daily Mail, and the rest of them rather aptly then labelled Kate as Waity Katie but now very conveniently and as well totally self-servingly, overlook that fact, are reminding their readers of just how conveniently and essentially badly William routinely and casually treated Kate, even misogynistically making her cry. Forgetting obviously to essentially similarly outline in their disingenuous and deceitful narrative that no one held a gun to Kate's head enforcedly making her unseemly wait on William. She very obviously did it all of her own will, and anyone, with even a most rudimentary modicum of common sense evidently knows why. Since no lad from Asda or who similarly worked as an NHS orderly or a Royal Mail postal worker, quite assuming that he was even looked at in the first place by Kate, would have been accorded the same misogynistic latitude that was so amply awarded to William Windsor by her. In effect, Kate had her eyes, as she still obsessively does, on emulating Camilla Parker Bowles, but is fretful and deeply worried that William now, but belatedly so, seeing her for what she really is: an acquisitive, self-serving, manipulative, egregiously social climbing narcissist and a wannabe queen, won't be like his father Charles in his committed loyalty, likewise one-sidedly, to Camilla, and so she Kate Middleton will similarly so, like Diana most despicably was, but simply very distinctively not so in the slightest sense morally in unethical Waity Katie's case, be surplus to his own requirements by her present husband, William.